'debatepoint.com is superior to truthmapping.com'
[ support:42% : certainty:84 ] · [29 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 80% · apples and orangesmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-12 06:10:04How can one be superior when they are really apples and oranges? From their [[web video|http://truthmapping.com/ab out.php] I see that truthmapping allows a user to support their position in detail whereas in debatepoint they simply make a single statement without support. -
oppose 80% · Re: apples and orangesmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by metric on 2007-01-20 17:04:17There's nothing stopping the submitter in contributing to the arguments as for or against the point they submit. The idea is to simplify arguments by targeting "points". If the point is too broad or irrelevant, there is direct point moderation coming in the future. -
oppose 80% · Re: apples and orangesmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-22 05:31:47But as we are demonstrating here, a back and forth "debate" takes us away from the topic. We can easily digress with this technique.
|
supporting arguments
0% ·
[make argument]
no supportive arguments over 0%
|
opposing arguments
100% ·
[make argument]
100%
· Re: apples and oranges
by metric on 2007-01-22 06:20:29
And I can easily moderate your comment as 'irrelevant', though I don't because I want it to be seen and I think it's relevant to the topic. BTW, if you log in, your comments will be automatically moderated to 100% when you submit them. As it is I have to moderate you as 'support' just to keep your comments from being buried under the debate.
|
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.