'debatepoint.com is superior to truthmapping.com'
[ support:42% : certainty:84 ] · [29 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 80% · show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-12 06:15:46Truthmapping initially hides the critiques which allows us to examine the argument without input that can sway our judgement. Then if you wish to view the critiques you can view them. Apples and oranges. -
oppose 80% · Re: show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by metric on 2007-01-20 17:10:33Falsifiability is paramount to the scientific method. Swaying judgment without it, IMO, is biased towards every positive argument. This is not apples and oranges if you consider that both sites are attempting uncover "truth". With that in mind its more like apples vs. rotten apples. -
oppose 80% · Re: show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-22 05:34:53Both methods allow users to critique so your opposition is without foundation.
summary
title: 'Re: show argument first'
text: 'Both methods allow users to critique so your opposition is without foundation.'
tags:
date: 2007-01-22 05:34:53
submitter: anonymous
effective: 0.8
support: 0
oppose: 1
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 1
repliesTotal: 1
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.