'debatepoint.com is superior to truthmapping.com'
[ support:42% : certainty:84 ] · [29 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 80% · show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-12 06:15:46Truthmapping initially hides the critiques which allows us to examine the argument without input that can sway our judgement. Then if you wish to view the critiques you can view them. Apples and oranges. -
oppose 80% · Re: show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by metric on 2007-01-20 17:10:33Falsifiability is paramount to the scientific method. Swaying judgment without it, IMO, is biased towards every positive argument. This is not apples and oranges if you consider that both sites are attempting uncover "truth". With that in mind its more like apples vs. rotten apples. -
oppose 80% · Re: show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by anonymous on 2007-01-22 05:34:53Both methods allow users to critique so your opposition is without foundation. -
oppose 100% · Re: show argument firstmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2007-01-22 06:26:32true, but truthmapping.com, by default, hides the opposing arguments. Here in this debate, almost all arguments are opposing! Opposition is a fundamental foundation of any debate.
summary
title: 'Re: show argument first'
text: 'true, but truthmapping.com, by default, hides the opposing arguments. Here in this debate, almost all arguments are opposing! Opposition is a fundamental foundation of any debate.'
tags: metric,
date: 2007-01-22 06:26:32
submitter: metric
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.