'teach evolution instead of creationism'
[ support:54% : certainty:51 ] · [31 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
support 100% · unconstitutionalmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2005-01-14 11:40:28Creationism fails the Lemon test established by the Supreme Court in Lemov vs. Kurtzman: Under the Lemon test, a government-sponsored message violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if: (1) it does not have a secular purpose, (2) its principal or primary effect advances or inhibits religion, or (3) it creates an excessive entanglement of the government with religion. -
oppose 20% · Re: unconstitutionalmoderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2006-03-07 18:19:41Without religion society cannot survive. When did civilisation come into existence? Yes exactly when religion came into existence. -
support 100% · Re: unconstitutionalmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by zeroKnots on 2006-08-09 20:13:02Not even. Civilization starts with excess resources (ie: storeage of grain). Religion starts only when you begin to have idle-time enough to endulge in it. Science begins to elaborate on religeon only after youre successful enough to support a liesure-class. Good idea to look at the origin though to figure what truth might be.
summary
title: 'Re: unconstitutional'
text: 'Not even. Civilization starts with excess resources (ie: storeage of grain). Religion starts only when you begin to have idle-time enough to endulge in it. Science begins to elaborate on religeon only after youre successful enough to support a liesure-class. Good idea to look at the origin though to figure what truth might be.'
tags: zeroKnots,
date: 2006-08-09 20:13:02
submitter: zeroKnots
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.