'Debating with this website's author is pointless because he doesn't believe in facts.'
[ support:-100% : certainty:28 ] · [5 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 80% · logical fallacymoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by metric on 2006-04-10 17:09:04This point is a logical fallacy because it attacks a person rather any issue. It's also known as an Ad Hominem attack. Try addressing real issues rather than their messengers. -
oppose 100% · Re: logical fallacymoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2006-04-11 02:23:52Actually, it wouldn't be considered ad hominem..
The point was criticizing me directly. An ad hominem attack would be criticizing me in order to persuade an outcome on some argument that I made.
summary
title: 'Re: logical fallacy'
text: 'Actually, it wouldn't be considered ad hominem..
The point was criticizing me directly. An ad hominem attack would be criticizing me in order to persuade an outcome on some argument that I made.'
tags: metric,
date: 2006-04-11 02:23:52
submitter: metric
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 2
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.