'teach evolution instead of creationism'
[ support:54% : certainty:51 ] · [31 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 17% · not "instead of"moderated to 100%; argued down by 83%
by me on 2005-04-20 10:03:50teach both, for goodness' sake. there's a lot more and more interesting material to be discussed regarding evolution, since it has a real observational and experimental history. creationism is take it or leave it. -
oppose 0% · Re: not "instead of"moderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-08-14 17:29:27If you mean as part of science teaching on an equal footing, that is a bit far fetched, given the more or less accepted standards for scientific enquiry and the tiny support of arguments and scientists that creationism has.
summary
title: 'Re: not "instead of"'
text: 'If you mean as part of science teaching on an equal footing, that is a bit far fetched, given the more or less accepted standards for scientific enquiry and the tiny support of arguments and scientists that creationism has.'
tags:
date: 2005-08-14 17:29:27
submitter: anonymous
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.