supporting arguments
0% ·
[make argument]
no supportive arguments over 0%
|
opposing arguments
100% ·
[make argument]
100%
· Re: Bertrand Russell
by yqbd on 2007-12-17 06:02:01
Bertrand Russell's problem is with what he think the First Cause argument is. He writes that it is "If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause.", but it's more like "everything that has a beginning has a cause" or "every effect has a cause". The First Cause is not an effect, so the First Cause does not have a cause.
0%
· Re: Bertrand Russell
by anonymous on 2013-06-03 17:37:44
This is not an argument. If you're too lazy to argue don't refer us to a book.
|