-
oppose 60% · Transcendental Argumentmoderated to 100%; argued down by 40%
by wikipedia on 2005-03-26 05:38:27The Transcendental Argument for the Non-existence of God [en.wikipedia.org] contests the existence of an intelligent Creator God by demonstrating that such a being would make logic and morality contingent, which is incompatible with the presuppositionalist assertion that they are necessary, and contradicts the efficacy of science. -
oppose 20% · transcendentally sillymoderated to 100%; argued down by 80%
by me on 2005-04-20 09:59:03this argument is, that is. -
support 50% · in a trancemoderated to 75%; argued down by 25%
by me on 2005-04-20 09:59:49it's always hard to accept arguments that require five-syllable words to express their reasoning. -
oppose 0% · Re: in a trancemoderated to 50%; argued down by 50%
by anonymous on 2005-12-21 15:34:47word to big for me. me no know what saying. If it is hard to accept an argument due to big words perhaps it shows your level of understanding on the topic, and basic intelligence. Thusly, supporting the opposition of it due to "big words" only lends credibility to those who would argue against you.
|
supporting arguments
0% ·
[make argument]
no supportive arguments over 0%
|
opposing arguments
0% ·
[make argument]
no opposition arguments over 0%
|
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.