'The "two party" system is bad for the US.'
[ support:45% : certainty:65 ] · [30 replies] ·
[1 comment]
-
Debate in the assembly of the country can often be adversarial and not constructive, sometimes revolving around narrowly perceived policy ideas, rather than larger political issues. Sometimes adversarial politics can lead to the opposition disagreeing with everything the government proposes (and vice versa) for the sake of disagreeing. This can lead to important legislation, especially reforms, being blocked that may be beneficial for the country.
-
oppose 0% · Re: gridlockmoderated to 100%; argued down by 100%
by anonymous on 2006-02-09 15:58:48That is right, since most of the third party are narrow minded, focusing on a specific issue, they will less likely to create girdlock with the other 2 big parties, and more importantly, certain amount of gridlock is vital against tyranny.
summary
title: 'Re: gridlock'
text: 'That is right, since most of the third party are narrow minded, focusing on a specific issue, they will less likely to create girdlock with the other 2 big parties, and more importantly, certain amount of gridlock is vital against tyranny.'
tags:
date: 2006-02-09 15:58:48
submitter: anonymous
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.