'Debating with this website's author is pointless because he doesn't believe in facts.'
[ support:-100% : certainty:28 ] · [5 replies] · [0 comment]
arguments · summary
style: sort by: reverse:
supporting arguments 0% · [make argument]
no supportive arguments over 0%
opposing arguments 100% · [make argument]
by metric on 2006-04-11 02:23:52
Actually, it wouldn't be considered ad hominem..
The point was criticizing me directly. An ad hominem attack would be criticizing me in order to persuade an outcome on some argument that I made.

Powered by Debatepoint.