'Debating with this website's author is pointless because he doesn't believe in facts.'
[ support:-100% : certainty:28 ] · [5 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
oppose 100% · two issuesmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2006-04-11 02:35:22Your point is actually two:
1. Debating with me is pointless.
2. I don't believe in facts.
point one is dependent on the validity of point 2, so I'll begin with concentrating on it first.
I believe in facts, though very few:
a. I believe in most Axioms
b. I believe in a priori knowledge.
c. I believe in Empirical knowledge
I'm sure there are more, but these are the big ones. So to say I don't believe in facts is false, therefore point 1 is by derivation false, and the main point submitted is also.. false
Maybe the author of the point could give some examples of "facts" that I don't believe in.
summary
title: 'two issues'
text: 'Your point is actually two:
1. Debating with me is pointless.
2. I don't believe in facts.
point one is dependent on the validity of point 2, so I'll begin with concentrating on it first.
I believe in facts, though very few:
a. I believe in most Axioms
b. I believe in a priori knowledge.
c. I believe in Empirical knowledge
I'm sure there are more, but these are the big ones. So to say I don't believe in facts is false, therefore point 1 is by derivation false, and the main point submitted is also.. false
Maybe the author of the point could give some examples of "facts" that I don't believe in.'
tags: metric,
date: 2006-04-11 02:35:22
submitter: metric
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 2
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.