'The "two party" system is bad for the US.'
[ support:45% : certainty:65 ] · [30 replies] ·
[1 comment]
-
support 100% · I Agreemoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2007-05-11 14:27:39During the 1992 Presidential elections, Ross Perot received 17% of the national vote; a major rebellion of U.S. voters against the two party system. However, when all was said and done that 17% was left with no voice in congress whatsoever. A constitutional amendment instituting a proportional element to our democratic system would a good thing, and would break down the two party system.
summary
title: 'I Agree'
text: 'During the 1992 Presidential elections, Ross Perot received 17% of the national vote; a major rebellion of U.S. voters against the two party system. However, when all was said and done that 17% was left with no voice in congress whatsoever. A constitutional amendment instituting a proportional element to our democratic system would a good thing, and would break down the two party system.'
tags:
date: 2007-05-11 14:27:39
submitter: anonymous
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.