parent point
-
-
Bertrand Russell's problem is with what he think the First Cause argument is. He writes that it is "If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause.", but it's more like "everything that has a beginning has a cause" or "every effect has a cause". The First Cause is not an effect, so the First Cause does not have a cause.
-
If we agree that all effects must have a cause, then by necessity there must be an un-caused cause.
title: 'Re: Bertrand Russell'
text: 'test'
tags:
date: 2013-06-03 17:34:21
submitter:
anonymous
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0