Debatepoint: microkernels are better than monolithic

'microkernels are better than monolithic'

[ support:33% : certainty:30 ] · [10 replies] · [1 comment]

parent point

oppose 100% · slow

moderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2004-12-24 19:41:46

microkernels are slower than monolithic. Mach is like 15% slower than a monolithic kernel like Linux.

[ 2 replies · support · oppose · comment ]

oppose 100% · Re: slow

moderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-01-16 23:22:16

You should give a reference for that statement. :) (This is pretty cool.)

[ 1 reply · support · oppose · comment ]

support 0% · Re: slow

moderated to 100%; argued down by 100%
by Brainix on 2006-02-01 05:25:16

The Performance of Âµ-Kernel-Based Systems

[ 0 replies · support · oppose · comment ]

arguments · summary

summary

title: 'Re: slow'
text: 'The Performance of Âµ-Kernel-Based Systems'
tags: technology microkernel performance
date: 2006-02-01 05:25:16
submitter: Brainix
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0

All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.