it needs a better description of the moderation system in "about".

needs protection from bots. prevent people from abusing system by creating multiple users.

disallow an author to moderate any of the child arguments of the author's argument.

might want to leave it up to google...

look into UTF8 support.

login failure needs to print something more informative.

needs functionality.. it's useless now.

you still got the "todo" on the argument sort.

when listing points, you need links to switch pages.

slashdot like disclaimer... "The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way."

the moderation system needs a breath of relativity. print two random arguments, one supportive, one opposing. Have the user select which one is better. score the arguments based on their percentage of wins... so then we can say our moderation system is based on pickthehottie technology.. [link] :)

Add a link somewhere to Stephen's guide to logical fallacies... like here: [link]

prevent identical points from being made. implement point moderation because it's impossible to filter out similarly equivalent points.

Position: Debatepoint needs to support IPA or TIPAESA or some other [http://www.livingplatform.ca/ti ki-index.php?page=open+politics+ argument|open politics argument]] standards - see that link for detailed position.

This is great. I have been fiddling with thoughs roughly along these lines myself.

A possible technical issue also: How do I give "half-hearted" support (75%). Perhaps I have to log on ?

What's with all the one-line arguements?

What needs improving? It just needs a better user base!

no point in listing any opposing arguments.. :)<BR> these probably should have gone in the comment section.

I just tried to visit 'debatepoint.com' and was redirected here, to 'debatepoint.org.' Since it does not exist, any statement about it, other than its non-existence, is false by derivation.